News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bitcoin’s Price Was Artificially Inflated Last Year, Rese... by ethbro on Wednesday June 13, 2018 @12:50PM (#17304809)
At USD$6.5B for a 51% attack (scraped off a website)...

... that's a smidge over 1% of the US military budget.

Re:Bitcoin’s Price Was Artificially Inflated Last Year, Rese... by spiorf on Thursday June 14, 2018 @04:05PM (#17314900)
51% lets you censor transactions. You need more than that to reverse a week old tx. Way more. You have to outrun the rest of the world and gain a week of advantage. So if you have 90% of the hashrate, you go 9 times faster than the honest miners. Every day, you can erase 9 days of blockchain. But that 90% means that you build a mining farm that is 9 times greater that the current hashrate. Redo the math on the costs and logistics of that.
Re:Bitcoin’s Price Was Artificially Inflated Last Year, Rese... by SilasX on Wednesday June 13, 2018 @01:10PM (#17305032)
Doesn't mean it's easy to get approval to spend that "smidge" on an attack.
Re:Bitcoin’s Price Was Artificially Inflated Last Year, Rese... by ethbro on Wednesday June 13, 2018 @01:21PM (#17305148)
"smidge over 1%"

It's not easy, but it's not impossible (to parent's bombastic assertion).

I believe the Manhattan project spent something like 0.55% of the US military budget (against ~2013USD$900b yearly budgets, which seemed the peak in 1942-45).

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/smidge

Re:Bitcoin’s Price Was Artificially Inflated Last Year, Rese... by SilasX on Wednesday June 13, 2018 @01:25PM (#17305189)
Because it had hard-won political approval; a bitcoin attack would face similar barriers.

And I know what smidge means, I was expressing ire at your attempt to sound folksy.

Re:Bitcoin’s Price Was Artificially Inflated Last Year, Rese... by ethbro on Wednesday June 13, 2018 @03:05PM (#17306055)
Fwiw, I'm actually pretty folksy.