Re:AT&T Cleared by Judge to Buy Time Warner
by skywhopper on Wednesday June 13, 2018 @07:10AM
(#17301993)
Not having a direct interest doesn’t guarantee they are neutral, true. That’s what net neutrality rules are for. But giving them interest in the content guarantees they _arent_ neutral, and will always have conflicting interests, regardless of regulation.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AT&T Cleared by Judge to Buy Time Warner
by jaredklewis on Wednesday June 13, 2018 @12:55PM
(#17304859)
If there was regulation, it doesn’t matter if they have a conflict of interest, because it would be illegal to prefer their own traffic.
If there is no regulation, AT&T has the exact same incentive to abuse their market position to make more money whether or not they own Time Warner. Whether they own Time Warner or not, they can make more money by being a non-neutral provider. Will they suddenly have a greater interest in money after they acquire Time Warner?