Re:Are real numbers really real?
by contravariant on Tuesday June 12, 2018 @02:38PM
(#17296464)
If we're going with the theory that things with a wavelength shorter than the Planck length don't exist then the sampling theorem should allow us to describe the universe with a discrete set of points.
General relativity complicates things (as usual) but the sampling theorem can be generalised to non-uniform samples so it should probably still work somehow.
In both cases this discrete theory is equivalent to a theory based on real numbers though, so in that sense there's not really any way to say which is better.
General relativity complicates things (as usual) but the sampling theorem can be generalised to non-uniform samples so it should probably still work somehow.
In both cases this discrete theory is equivalent to a theory based on real numbers though, so in that sense there's not really any way to say which is better.