Re:Critical vulnerability of NPM package macaddress
by staticassertion on Monday June 11, 2018 @03:04PM
(#17287411)
I disagree for exactly the reasons I've stated - "more vulns" doesn't take impact into account. "More vulns" doesn't take who is reporting them into account (internal? paid pentester?). These things matter a lot.
Again, look at projects that pay for vulns. They have hundreds a year - this is a good thing. They come in at a continuous rate.
Again, look at projects that pay for vulns. They have hundreds a year - this is a good thing. They come in at a continuous rate.
Counting is pointless.