>>My point is that you can't start a business based upon some vague hope that someday, somehow, someone will possibly choose to donate money to you. You need a reliable stream of income, and one that will keep coming long after the shine has worn off the original product and now you're slogging through complicated maintenance and upgrades
What part of that doesn't apply equally proprietary software too?
I see the biggest difference being that with commercial software you know when to stop and move on to something else.
Re:On paying for software
by justinclift on Sunday June 10, 2018 @12:12PM
(#17278765)
Ahhh. Yeah, now I understand what you mean.
For an already successful OSS project though, it might be a way to turn that into an ongoing income stream to then continue improving the software.
My point is that you can't start a business based upon some vague hope that someday, somehow, someone will possibly choose to donate money to you. You need a reliable stream of income, and one that will keep coming long after the shine has worn off the original product and now you're slogging through complicated maintenance and upgrades.
You want to know why the JS ecosystem keeps suffering from the "shiny penny" problem ? This is one of the reasons.