Chatbots were the next big thing: what happened?

Re:Chatbots were the next big thing: what happened? by TomMarius on Saturday June 09, 2018 @07:42AM (#17272545)

That changes nothing about Android being Linux based, though. The word "based" has a definition, and you're trying to change it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Chatbots were the next big thing: what happened? by dozzie on Saturday June 09, 2018 @08:56AM (#17272790)

Then what does it mean "to be based on"? What's its definition, and a one that's well-established and commonly agreed upon, since you're trying to invoke it?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Chatbots were the next big thing: what happened? by TomMarius on Saturday June 09, 2018 @10:49AM (#17273294)

"a fundamental principle or groundwork; foundation; basis"[1]

[1] http://www.dictionary.com/browse/based

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Chatbots were the next big thing: what happened? by dozzie on Saturday June 09, 2018 @01:33PM (#17274009)

And in what way is the Linux kernel the "fundamental principle" or "foundation" of Android? How is it so important that you can rip it out and replace with something totally different without much change to the applications running on top?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Chatbots were the next big thing: what happened? by TomMarius on Sunday June 10, 2018 @08:14AM (#17277757)

You can replace NT with Linux (or Linux with NT) as well. Userspace has nothing to do with this, kernel has its API and the userspace is built on top of it

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Chatbots were the next big thing: what happened? by dozzie on Sunday June 10, 2018 @11:21AM (#17278504)

> You can replace NT with Linux (or Linux with NT) as well.

No, not quite, not without enormous effort. Look at Cygwin or WSL or Wine: tons of work poured into and still not there yet.

On the other hand, typical Android application only ever touches Android's API and doesn't even leave its JVM. Replacing whole kernel (with obvious single point of work in Java interpreter) would be practically invisible.

[ Parent | on HN ]