AI at Google: our principles

Re:AI at Google: our principles by ocdtrekkie on Thursday June 07, 2018 @07:49PM (#17261386)

Many of the Googlers involved in the campaign against Project Maven are engineers of high caliber and those I know of are fairly activist in general. While I haven't always agreed with those I've interacted with, they're high quality people with high quality records. The sort of Googlers protesting Maven are the sort of Googlers who made Google the sort of company people loved. And they've put their careers on the line to make a statement about what is and isn't okay.

Sundar Pichai's claim to fame was getting the Google Toolbar installer (and later the Chrome one) injected into the Adobe Reader installer. [0]

[0] https://www.quora.com/What-did-Sundar-Pichai-do-that-his-pee...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI at Google: our principles by plankers on Friday June 08, 2018 @05:37AM (#17263883)

I don't know how accurate it is to say that these engineers have put their careers on the line. It could also be that they wouldn't be able to make these statements were they not secure enough in their jobs to feel their careers wouldn't be on the line.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI at Google: our principles by ocdtrekkie on Friday June 08, 2018 @08:48AM (#17264751)

While they definitely have above average incomes and probably some good financial security, there's a Damore factor risk: Public attention could render them unhireable if they come off as troublesome or likely to cause issues with future employers.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI at Google: our principles by 49bc on Thursday June 07, 2018 @10:26PM (#17262079)

> Microsoft didn't even ask their customers for permission. They just automatically switched anyone who installed IE7 to Bing as the default.

Don’t worry everyone it’s different now!

[ Parent | on HN ]