Antitrust isn't about committing a crime so much as competing so well that the the company sucks the oxygen from the room. Becoming a monopoly isn't evil. It's an excess of success.
It's the responsibility of government antitrust law, not Google, to 'un-distort' the playing field and resurrect competition / opportunity. No one expects a corporation to voluntarily give away marketshare to ensure it doesn't run afoul of antitrust law, just because the company also vowed not to be evil. A negotiated settlement with regulators is exactly where this kind of matter should lead; no crime done.
Re:AI at Google: our principles
by erikpukinskis on Thursday June 07, 2018 @10:29PM
(#17262097)
Yes, being a monopoly isn’t evil, leveraging monopoly position is.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/08/18/google_had_obamas_e...
If that's supposed to be "our best", we're in trouble.