Re:Alphabet shareholders reject diversity proposal backed by...
by adamnemecek on Thursday June 07, 2018 @12:11PM
(#17257158)
> society to not hire someone because their skin is too dark.
In SV, I can't imagine this being that common. However let's take an example. There's an interview for a position and the interviewer is a white American. Two applicants of equal skill apply. One of them is African American who's attended the same high school as the interviewer. The other one is a recent emigrant from Russia who is skilled technically however his "cultural awareness" might be lacking. Who is more likely to get hired? This is a rhetorical question. I actually don't know.
Re:Alphabet shareholders reject diversity proposal backed by...
by daveFNbuck on Thursday June 07, 2018 @12:23PM
(#17257305)
You're changing the subject. Let's stick to your first question for now. You were asking whether the arguments for diversity of race and gender could be applied to diversity of skill.
Does the argument I gave for diversity of race apply to diversity of skill? If not, do you think I gave a non-standard argument for diversity of race?
Re:Alphabet shareholders reject diversity proposal backed by...
by adamnemecek on Thursday June 07, 2018 @12:24PM
(#17257321)
I'm not actually, I'm pointing out a type of diversity that the commonly accepted notion of diversity doesn't quite capture.
Re:Alphabet shareholders reject diversity proposal backed by...
by daveFNbuck on Thursday June 07, 2018 @12:29PM
(#17257374)
Yet when I press you on your concrete example of diversity of skill, you immediately move on to a different example without responding to what I said.
The argument is that it's unfair and harmful to the individual, your company, and society to not hire someone because their skin is too dark. Do you think that's true of not hiring someone who isn't qualified?