Re:Retguard: An improved stack protector for OpenBSD
by sthen on Wednesday June 06, 2018 @03:48PM
(#17250455)
If you can say "easily" for this, you can't have tried actually importing the OpenBSD CVS repository into git. cvs2gitdump doesn't do too bad of a job, but doesn't attempt tags and branches. I haven't found another conversion tool that gets anywhere close.
Re:Retguard: An improved stack protector for OpenBSD
by gmfawcett on Wednesday June 06, 2018 @09:22PM
(#17252521)
I'm not suggesting that CVS to Git is easy. I'm just saying that Github doesn't present any kind of barrier to adoption of Git (in any project, not just OpenBSD).
Re:Retguard: An improved stack protector for OpenBSD
by nameiscubanpete on Thursday June 07, 2018 @03:13PM
(#17259168)
It's a PITA for any reasonably large/old CVS repo. Partly because CVS is fundamentally broke.
Re:Retguard: An improved stack protector for OpenBSD
by ams6110 on Wednesday June 06, 2018 @04:20PM
(#17250756)
No, Facebook and Reddit, big as they are, don't make their own browsers and are still individually minorities in the grand scheme of the world wide web.
Git is used by a comparatively small captive audience; most git users are invested in GitHub. MS is well positioned to run their "embrace, extend, extinguish" play if they wanted to.
Re:Retguard: An improved stack protector for OpenBSD
by teknopurge on Wednesday June 06, 2018 @03:49PM
(#17250464)
Your analogy is invalid. A correct analogy is that Facebook owns your photos and posts the way github owns what you push.
OpenBSD could easily use Git if they wanted to, and they'd never have to touch MS code, or an MS Web property.