News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla won’t give drivers their own crash data without a c... by FireBeyond on Tuesday June 05, 2018 @11:09AM (#17238366)
I think they would view that as destruction of evidence.

The next step in your scenario is "that security camera has data on me, I want it deleted".

Re:Tesla won’t give drivers their own crash data without a c... by yumraj on Tuesday June 05, 2018 @12:29PM (#17239305)
Not really, especially if the cameras are 3rd party owned. My comment was explicitly about my own devices, with the argument being that they are an extension of my brain/memory as opposed to evidence in the traditional sense.

The link provided by wang_li applies and it seems such questions have come up in the past in front of courts, and honestly I won't be surprised if they come up again.

Re:Tesla won’t give drivers their own crash data without a c... by kofejnik on Tuesday June 05, 2018 @11:31AM (#17238609)
I believe GDPR does cover the security camera scenario, there was a comment here about a week ago from someone who successfully petitioned the German police to delete all footage of him at some protest
Re:Tesla won’t give drivers their own crash data without a c... by Skye on Tuesday June 05, 2018 @11:39AM (#17238696)
https://ico.org.uk/your-data-matters/cctv/ at least in the UK, you can request people who have CCTV footage of you, and also note that people have to delete CCTV when they no longer need it (how long that should be is arguable), so people have to delete CCTV without being prompted to. and this is not new with the GDPR, it's from the old law, from 1998, I think.