Then they should own up to that decision and realize that what they did not only helped github to be so dominant but it also actively worked against viable alternatives.
Choose more carefully next time? Maybe firefox instead of chrome? etc.
Choose more carefully next time? Maybe firefox instead of chrome? etc.
I think it's reasonable to say that people understood that there were tradeoffs in hosting code on a site like github. Since it had become a popular site, the gains from the network effect outweighed the more theoretical risks, at least for the short term...