Ask HN: What companies are using probabilistic programming?

Re:Ask HN: What companies are using probabilistic programming? by currymj on Monday June 04, 2018 @12:22PM (#17229424)

It's definitely not a legacy framework, it's very actively developed and improved.

A lot of very useful statistical models can't benefit from the GPU, and for them I think Stan is the better tool. There's a reason it's basically the default choice for people who want to use probabilistic programming for Bayesian statistics.

It's probably not the best tool for AI/ML type models. But for statisticians who want to use Bayesian methods it's close to perfect.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: What companies are using probabilistic programming? by boltzmannbrain on Monday June 04, 2018 @04:50PM (#17232307)

Thanks that's good to know.

Haha I knew "legacy" would ruffle some feathers, by which I mean Stan was pretty much the first application-ready PPS on the block -- robust toolbox of methods, actively developed/supported.

The last slide of this presentation on SMC inference in PPLs is a nice view of the PPS landscape (not to mention the whole deck is a great intro by Lawrence Murray): http://www.it.uu.se/research/systems_and_control/education/2...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: What companies are using probabilistic programming? by currymj on Monday June 04, 2018 @06:27PM (#17233211)

Yeah, I see what you're getting at now. And that is an excellent diagram.

I've never actually used BUGS or JAGS for anything but I would consider at least BUGS to truly be legacy software. To me the word "legacy" means you shouldn't pick it for a new project.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: What companies are using probabilistic programming? by xitrium on Tuesday June 05, 2018 @12:20AM (#17234966)

GPU and MPI support in Stan coming hopefully this summer!

[ Parent | on HN ]