News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on GitLab is open core, GitHub is closed source (2016). Parent comment

Re:GitLab is open core, GitHub is closed source (2016) by dev_north_east on Monday June 04, 2018 @08:57AM (#17227252)
> Office, SQL Server or even Visual Studio - even when most of them have better open source alternatives.

I'll leave the middle one, but c'mon there is nothing close to VS and the open alternatives to Office are not in the same ball-park.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GitLab is open core, GitHub is closed source (2016) by sGatling1788 on Monday June 04, 2018 @11:01AM (#17228362)
My guess is upwards of 90% of users would not use features in MSOffice not available in Open/LibreOffice. Most organizations are "creatively encouraged" (ie. forced) to use MSOffice.

Similar for SQLServer - Windows shops kind of default to it.

VS is the exception.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GitLab is open core, GitHub is closed source (2016) by pnutjam on Monday June 04, 2018 @12:58PM (#17229789)
Open/LibreOffice have better compatibility with old versions of office. Visio is another standout with no real Open Source competitor.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GitLab is open core, GitHub is closed source (2016) by vetinari on Monday June 04, 2018 @10:13AM (#17227895)
I would put anything made by Jetbrains in front of VS in the imaginary queue ordering the products in the same ball-park, not just close. Some of their products (Intellij Idea Community, Pycharm Community) are open source.
[ Parent | on HN ]