Re:Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub
by RyanZAG on Monday June 04, 2018 @03:13AM
(#17225303)
Github don't control git --
> Torvalds turned over maintenance on 26 July 2005 to Junio Hamano, a major contributor to the project.[25] Hamano was responsible for the 1.0 release on 21 December 2005, and remains the project's maintainer.[26]
I'm guessing Torvalds still has a lot of control if push came to shove, so we can assume git is executively controlled by Torvalds and Hamano.
Re:Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub
by feenix566 on Monday June 04, 2018 @10:02AM
(#17227847)
Not many people use git without Github though, whether it's Github proper or a local installation of Github Enterprise. It's pretty tough to do code reviews without it. There are tools out there to do it, but Github is the standard.
Re:Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub
by Zash on Monday June 04, 2018 @06:47AM
(#17226487)
Github does own a vast share of the git-related developer mindshare tho, which is probably more valuable to Microsoft.
Re:Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub
by stephenr on Sunday June 03, 2018 @11:04PM
(#17224253)
Git != GitHub, fyi.
Re:Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub
by Fill1200 on Monday June 04, 2018 @12:49AM
(#17224747)
I want Mercurial and Subversion in GitHub.
Makes sense they try to control the future of the tool they use in so meny projects.