Re:Ask HN: What's your favorite way of getting a web app up ...
by hellofunk on Sunday June 03, 2018 @12:20PM
(#17220248)
It's too late for me to edit my comment, but here is the proper link:
Re:Ask HN: What's your favorite way of getting a web app up ...
by vonseel on Sunday June 03, 2018 @09:19AM
(#17219373)
I wonder why Ruby ended up in the negative coefficient group instead of exhibiting similar characteristics to Python, for example.
Re:Ask HN: What's your favorite way of getting a web app up ...
by hellofunk on Sunday June 03, 2018 @09:34AM
(#17219444)
It's quite an interesting study to read, and not long. I recommend giving it a few minutes to answer that question.
Re:Ask HN: What's your favorite way of getting a web app up ...
by vonseel on Sunday June 03, 2018 @11:16AM
(#17219927)
Thanks, assumed it would be too academic or technical to understand and didn’t look at it. Will check now..
Actually, the link is not working on mobile. Maybe it will work on my desktop.
Re:Ask HN: What's your favorite way of getting a web app up ...
by Volt on Sunday June 03, 2018 @11:47AM
(#17220079)
Try this permalink instead: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3126905
> True speed comes when you don't have to deal with other people's bugs and poorly designed mistakes.
PHP is often, in practice, a language where bugs are more likely compared to these "stylish" other languages you mention. [0]
[0] http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/3130000/3126905/p91-ray.pdf?...
" For [languages] with positive coefficients we can expect that the language is associated with a greater number of defect fixes. These languages include C, C++, Objective-C, Php, and Python. The languages Clojure, Haskell, Ruby, and Scala, all have negative coefficients implying that these languages are less likely than average to result in defect fixing commits."