> Fonts are easy enough to self-host

But what’s special about fonts? If I can’t reference an asset outside my own domain because the network request could allow the 3rd party to log an IP address, How is that not antithetical to the foundation of the WWW?

Besides the fact that this goes against the last decade of advice on how to speed up your site...

Nothing says you can't link to those resources, but if the page automatically loads them (hotlinked images, scripts, remote fonts, etc.) then there's an issue.

Is it really that unreasonable that loading a page to x.com should only load resources from x.com and 3rd-party resources compatible with X's privacy policy?

> Nothing says you can't link to those resources, but if the page automatically loads them (hotlinked images, scripts, remote fonts, etc.) then there's an issue.

Seems like a contradiction, and exactly my point. Trying to collect privacy policies and compliance statements from any place you might load an <img> or <script> from is extraordinarily burdensome and pointless besides. Totally absurd over-reach IMO.

And what about the 25 hops in between you and them which also collect your IP and the domain being contacted?

How they "don't face consequences" if it is wrong?! Google (along with Facebook) are very much going to be the first in the line for auditing - and I believe the first complaints against them have been filled on the first day GDPR was in force already. The entire raison d'etre of GDPR is very much Google and Facebook, who were thumbing their noses at EU's privacy regulations so far.

If someone is going to have top-notch legal team on this it is going to be Google. So if Google's legal says that it is alright because they are the data processor/controller as defined by GDPR you can pretty much take them for the word there.

I wonder whether people spreading this sort of panicked disinformation about the fonts and what not have actually read the GDPR text. It is pretty clear about who is considered to be a "data processor" or "controller" - someone who merely uses a resource like fonts is certainly not one if you aren't collecting any information yourself or having someone else do it on your behalf. That Google may be doing it is irrelevant as long as they aren't providing the data to you (which would make you a "data controller").

And if you are neither a data controller nor data processor you aren't concerned by GDPR at all.

It is well explained here: https://www.gdpreu.org/the-regulation/key-concepts/data-cont...