Re:A 64-year-old put his life savings in his carry-on, and U...
by microcolonel on Saturday June 02, 2018 @09:41AM
(#17214557)
Yeah, it seems to be pretty clear. They justify it on the technicality that they are not charging you, but an inanimate object with no rights; but honestly they could do this with almost anything you own, including your own body, through reasoning which is only slightly more ludicrous.
Re:A 64-year-old put his life savings in his carry-on, and U...
by DrScump on Saturday June 02, 2018 @08:01PM
(#17217112)
Even "wrong" decisions have the force of law.
I haven't read any specific cases, but I wonder if 5th (and 4th) Amendment issues were raised at trial in the first place; perhaps those protections weren't even put in play properly.
[Update] an example of this concern is raised elsewhere in this thread[0].
It's one of those situations where IIRC the Supreme Court's relevant ruling from long ago was just plain wrong.
I think just about every sane adult agrees that this violates the Bill of Rights, regardless of any SCOTUS opinions to the contrary.