Re:Bypassing website anti-scraping protections
by dvfjsdhgfv on Friday June 01, 2018 @11:51AM
(#17206508)
That's why I was wondering. Last time I checked headless Chrome could be pretty reliably detected in a number of ways, as you say. That they mention just one variable seems quite odd, given that they position themselves as specialists in the field.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bypassing website anti-scraping protections
by jardah on Friday June 01, 2018 @11:54AM
(#17206558)
The webdriver property is as far as we know the only one that stays different if you use non-headless chrome with puppeteer. Rest can be handled by use of non-headless chrome as mentioned in the article.
But you are right, after reading through it again, this section of the article should be improved.