News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Canada hits back at 'punitive' U.S. tariffs in 'turning p... by akhatri_aus on Thursday May 31, 2018 @09:02PM (#17201725)
I think you mean sanctions, not tariffs or quotas. There is not a single country that does not apply tariffs or quotas.
Re:Canada hits back at 'punitive' U.S. tariffs in 'turning p... by Karishma1234 on Thursday May 31, 2018 @09:47PM (#17201972)
You call them sanctions when you talk about your enemies, you call them tariffs when you do it to your friends. The difference is nearly 0.
Re:Canada hits back at 'punitive' U.S. tariffs in 'turning p... by akhatri_aus on Thursday May 31, 2018 @11:04PM (#17202278)
Sanctions involve a total ban on trade. tariffs involve a tax on imports, quota impose a limit on imports. If only 0 was an asymptote it would fit your description.
Re:Canada hits back at 'punitive' U.S. tariffs in 'turning p... by Karishma1234 on Saturday June 02, 2018 @06:53PM (#17216840)
Think of ban as a variable between 0 - 1. Sanctions = 1.0 and Tarrifs < 1.0. Tarrifs are sanctions.

(Increasing taxes on something is a partial ban).

Re:Canada hits back at 'punitive' U.S. tariffs in 'turning p... by toomanybeersies on Thursday May 31, 2018 @10:29PM (#17202150)
Singapore doesn't. Not in the trade protectionist sense anyway.
Re:Canada hits back at 'punitive' U.S. tariffs in 'turning p... by akhatri_aus on Thursday May 31, 2018 @11:03PM (#17202275)
Not really, even Singapore has its duties. It's only 0% for everything if you're going for re-export.

https://www.customs.gov.sg/businesses/valuation-duties-taxes...

Re:Canada hits back at 'punitive' U.S. tariffs in 'turning p... by toomanybeersies on Thursday May 31, 2018 @11:49PM (#17202437)
Excise is a bit different to tariffs though. Even if you produced those items in Singapore you pay the same excise.

The 20% on cars isn't to protect the (non-existent) car manufacturing industry of Singapore, but to reduce demand for cars.