News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by Frondo on Wednesday May 30, 2018 @11:26AM (#17188423)
Yes, probably most people are materialistic, low IQ, and shallow. You're probably no different, and I don't mean that as an insult -- just that you're human, too, like all of us. Welcome to the club.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by Antimachides on Wednesday May 30, 2018 @01:36PM (#17189734)
That's ridiculous. Some people absolutely stand out as not being materialistic and shallow. And some positively excel at it, to grotesque proportions. Don't pretend we are all in the same cesspool.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by charlesdm on Wednesday May 30, 2018 @09:36AM (#17187503)
You must be a catch. Depends what you're looking for in life, I guess.

There's a difference between shopping until you drop, and giving the woman you love the occasional gift to show that you love and appreciate her.

Yes, it's not required, you don't _NEED_ expensive jewellery or fancy weddings, but if you have excess money that you are not investing, why not?

On the flipside, I also like getting nice gifts. Don't you?

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by Antimachides on Wednesday May 30, 2018 @09:48AM (#17187580)
Give her a blood diamond to show my affection? No thanks. I'm not brainwashed to think love is suitably communicated through the purchase of goods and services. Excess money not being invested? By golly I better not use it for any form of good; it must obviously go to De Beers!

Just tell someone you love them and do nice things for them and be there for them. It's free.

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by charlesdm on Wednesday May 30, 2018 @09:54AM (#17187635)
It's not, and it doesn't need to be a diamond -- it could be flowers, a nice dinner, a exciting getaway together to some obscure place, etc. But the way you're expressing this is you'd laugh someone away for buying something for you.

I'm into mechanical watches. Just because I find them interesting, not for show. I'm not brainwashed, but heck, getting one I really want from someone I love would be close to the ultimate gift. Do I need it? Of course not. Do I expect it? Of course not.

[dead]
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by throwawaymath on Wednesday May 30, 2018 @10:25AM (#17187890)
> I was talking about diamonds and extravagence desired purely to display wealth and social status (women are particularly vulnerable to this folly)

Now you're just being casually sexist. If you want to judge people for how they choose to celebrate their mutual affection that's fine. So diamonds aren't your thing, thanks for sharing. But let's not go down the rabbit hole of litigating one gender's susceptibility over another's.

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by to_bpr on Wednesday May 30, 2018 @12:12PM (#17188925)
>Materialistic, low IQ and shallow. Though that's what most people are, I suppose.

You should look into getting a therapist to talk through whatever has soured your outlook on life to this point of bitter cynicism.

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by dang on Thursday May 31, 2018 @12:57AM (#17194053)
This comment breaks the site guidelines by crossing into personal attack, and also by feeding a flamewar by replying. Please don't do that. Just flag the egregious comments instead.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by to_bpr on Thursday May 31, 2018 @11:11AM (#17196875)
This wasn't a personal attack. It was an earnest suggestion.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by dang on Thursday May 31, 2018 @12:15PM (#17197485)
I believe you. But if you're going to venture into personally intimate areas like whether someone needs psychotherapy, the burden is on you to clearly disambiguate your intent, because these moves are commonly used to snark at and demean others.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by Antimachides on Wednesday May 30, 2018 @01:20PM (#17189565)
Am I wrong? Can I change what is there simply by thinking about it a different way? Is that some quantum spook trick you can teach me?