News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AI winter is well on its way by felippee on Wednesday May 30, 2018 @12:23AM (#17185052)
Hey, a small advice for the future: never build your belief entirely on a youtube video of a demo. In fact, never build your belief based on a demo, period.

This is notorious with current technology: you can demonstrate anything. A few years ago Tesla demonstrated a driverless car. And what? Nothing. Absolutely nothing.

I'm willing to believe stuff I can test myself at home. If it works there, it likely actually works (though possibly needs more testing). But demo booths and youtube - never.

Re:AI winter is well on its way by paul_milovanov on Wednesday May 30, 2018 @12:41AM (#17185110)
Your advice would be a lot more convincing if you had a youtube video of a demo to come with it. Just saying. :P
Re:AI winter is well on its way by tensor on Wednesday May 30, 2018 @12:51AM (#17185153)
You can't test most of high end physics at home. I hope that doesn't mean you don't believe it!
Re:AI winter is well on its way by shub on Wednesday May 30, 2018 @01:54AM (#17185404)
A lab publishes an exciting result, what does the physics community do? Wait for replication. Or if you’re LHC, be very careful what you publish.
Re:AI winter is well on its way by sanxiyn on Wednesday May 30, 2018 @03:59AM (#17185908)
In theory, there are two separate experiments (ATLAS and CMS) on LHC because of this. In practice, they are probably not independent enough.
Re:AI winter is well on its way by oldgradstudent on Wednesday May 30, 2018 @08:08PM (#17192976)
It's probably a good idea to ignore high-end physics results for a few years, though.

The BICEP2 fiasco is a good example why.