News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Importance of Deep Work and the 30-Hour Method for Le... by taeric on Saturday May 26, 2018 @05:28PM (#17164339)
The archetypes were the "monastic", "bimodal", etc. Called them strategies, but each is backed by a success.

But, if you have evidence that these are more successful than alternatives, I'm game. Where is the evidence? For that matter, what are the alternatives?

(Currently typing with my 4mo old. So... apologies for any typos.)

Re:The Importance of Deep Work and the 30-Hour Method for Le... by coldtea on Saturday May 26, 2018 @07:29PM (#17164739)
>But, if you have evidence that these are more successful than alternatives, I'm game. Where is the evidence? For that matter, what are the alternatives?

The strategies (or archetypes) are just 4 different ways to achieve a focus period for doing some work.

Regardless of which you pick, the core thing you look for in each (and possibly others, but those seem quite an exhaustive list of such strategies, or at least the major ones) is focused work.

I don't think we need any evidence besides the mountains of empirical evidence that focused work is better - not any more than people needed evidence that we should breath before we learned about oxygen and the workings of the lungs...

Re:The Importance of Deep Work and the 30-Hour Method for Le... by taeric on Sunday May 27, 2018 @07:48PM (#17169806)
Is there mountains of evidence? Seems like mountains of anecdotes. Most famous work was work for hire. And yet we don't hear how getting paid for what you produce helps you produce. Often we hear the opposite.