>GMO is largely about implanting resistance against herbicides such as glyphosate or genes for the production of pesticides like the BT-gene. Both are there to support pesticide heavy monocultures of which we are seeing the negative effects unfolding.

Except the BT gene is exactly the opposite of a pesticide-heavy monoculture. The point is to make spraying unnecessary. Do you usually just invert the reality of things that clash with your preferred narrative?

>Most of the food is still farmed by poor small scale farmers, which are often more efficient than large-scale farmers.

Curious about this claim, I found https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agricultural_productivity#Sour...:

  Some sources of agricultural productivity are:
  -Mechanization
  -High yield varieties, which were the basis of the Green revolution
  -Fertilizers: Primary plant nutrients: nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium[5][6] and secondary nutrients such as sulfur, zinc, copper, manganese, calcium, magnesium and molybdenum on deficient soil
  -Education in management and entrepreneurial techniques to decrease fixed and variable costs and optimise manpower
  -Liming of acid soils to raise pH and to provide calcium and magnesium
  -Irrigation
  -Herbicides
  -Genetic engineering
  -Pesticides
  -Increased plant density
  -Animal feed made more digestible by processing
  -Keeping animals indoors in cold weather

I don't think any of these correlate with smaller farm size. Do you have any sources?