News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Reality Driven Development: Fixing Project Management in Software. Parent comment

Re:Reality Driven Development: Fixing Project Management in ... by amarkov on Friday May 25, 2018 @01:04PM (#17155674)
High level estimates aren’t optional for most development. Customers waiting for an important feature won’t take “ it’ll come when it comes, estimates aren’t real” as an answer.

You can skip low level estimates, but the consequence of that is that high level timelines are uninformed by them. That’s how you end up in the archetypal situation where all the engineers know a project will slip while their managers report it’s right on track.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Reality Driven Development: Fixing Project Management in ... by bsandert on Friday May 25, 2018 @01:24PM (#17155934)
In my experience, knowing when work on some functionality will _start_ plus a rough estimate on effort (talking hours/days/weeks level) is quite acceptable for most stakeholders. It is also far easier to provide, and less likely to be off by an order of magnitude, which some low-level estimates may suffer from.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Reality Driven Development: Fixing Project Management in ... by giulianob on Friday May 25, 2018 @02:11PM (#17156421)
My point is you need to balance the effort you're putting into your estimates vs getting work done. Customers also won't be happy when you give them a date and don't meet it. Honesty is important too.
[ Parent | on HN ]