News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Three Charged in Fatal Kansas ‘Swatting’ Attack by AnaniasAnanas on Thursday May 24, 2018 @03:55PM (#17147694)
> NOBODY should be allowed to defend themselves with a gun

Why?

[dead]
Re:Three Charged in Fatal Kansas ‘Swatting’ Attack by lutorm on Thursday May 24, 2018 @10:15PM (#17150138)
This is painting the devil on the wall.

First, out of all risks you face in life, "multiple armed or unarmed assailants who wish to do me grievous bodily harm" is not really the one that you should be worrying about.

Second, how would a handgun help you take on assailants armed with automatic weapons? So then you need an automatic weapon? But how will an automatic weapon help you take on assailants armed with hand grenades and RPGs? So then you need hand grenades and RPGS? Tanks? Fighter jets? Nuclear weapons? Your reasoning can be taken arbitrarily far.

Do you take the same approach to all other, very unlikely, risks that you face in life?

Re:Three Charged in Fatal Kansas ‘Swatting’ Attack by 15155 on Friday May 25, 2018 @12:00PM (#17154985)
> is not really the one that you should be worrying about.

Not all of us are as privileged as you to live in a safe area.

> Second, how would a handgun help you take on assailants armed with automatic weapons? So then you need an automatic weapon

A handgun is good enough of an equalizer in the situations I am likely to face. For the relatively low cost, effort required, there's no substitute.

> Do you take the same approach to all other, very unlikely, risks that you face in life?

- How is it your place to determine the likelihood that I get into a violent altercation? - Why does my area now require some standard of "likelihood of violence" before I am allowed to protect myself?

- How is it your place to make these risk-based judgment calls for me and others?

The fact is: carrying a firearm takes ten seconds out of my day (to put on). Some might describe that as "living in fear," but I'll trade the ten seconds for the capabilities having said firearm confers. It's really not a big deal, despite what some might think.

I'll also take the time to test and install fire extinguishers in my home.. or is my home catching fire a "very unlikely risk" I shouldn't be prepared for, too, in one's expert opinion?

Re:Three Charged in Fatal Kansas ‘Swatting’ Attack by pwinnski on Friday May 25, 2018 @11:50AM (#17154861)
Many, many, many countries have far stricter controls on either weapons or ammunition, and those countries aren't filled with roving armed gangs attacking 90-year-old women and single mothers.

This is fear-mongering, based on wildly unrealistic assertions about the world.

Re:Three Charged in Fatal Kansas ‘Swatting’ Attack by 15155 on Friday May 25, 2018 @12:04PM (#17155032)
> roving armed gangs attacking 90-year-old women and single mothers.

So basically: this woman isn't allowed to defend herself from burglars, is that what you are saying?

> This is fear-mongering, based on wildly unrealistic assertions about the world.

It's great that you are privileged enough to live in an area without any violent crime! That's truly great!

I don't live in a safe area, so I don't believe that you or others have any right nor place to make that decision for me.

> fear-mongering,

Home burglaries are the number one type of crime in my area. Home invasions happen, whether you want to call them "fear-mongering" or not. Should I just not be able to defend my home, my person, my family? Should I trust the good will of the felon who broke in NOT to harm me further or take my things?