News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on NASA is bringing cryosleep chambers out of fiction. Parent comment

Re:NASA is bringing cryosleep chambers out of fiction by alex_duf on Thursday May 24, 2018 @12:36PM (#17145715)
Without knowing I would assume IPFS is built on TCP, wouldn't that be an issue?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:NASA is bringing cryosleep chambers out of fiction by lgierth on Saturday May 26, 2018 @06:32PM (#17164581)
More transports coming! IPFS is built on libp2p, and so far all available libp2p transports have been stream-oriented (TCP, Websockets, WebRTC, Onion, QUIC), but different types of transports are in the works: packet-oriented (UDP, Ethernet, WebRTC-unreliable) and store-and-forward.

Apart from that IPFS is built and layered in a way that makes the application layer independent of transport semantics - the network in terms of connections and hosts is abstracted away.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:NASA is bringing cryosleep chambers out of fiction by carry_bit on Thursday May 24, 2018 @04:30PM (#17148109)
It's built on a generic interface so other protocols could be used.
[ Parent | on HN ]