Re:Judge Rules Trump Can’t Block People on Twitter
by echotango on Wednesday May 23, 2018 @11:51PM
(#17140953)
So you're saying if fox news set up a 'private' website to host trump's posts and only allowed pro-trump people to comment that wouldnt violate free speech because it is a private website and the government itself isn't banning people who criticize it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Judge Rules Trump Can’t Block People on Twitter
by icebraining on Thursday May 24, 2018 @04:45AM
(#17142221)
Fox News wouldn't violate the first amendment. At most, the POTUS might be prevented from using that website.
(Nitpick: "free speech" is a general philosophical concept; we're talking about the 1st Amendment, which is a particular application of one of many views on that concept)
Re:Judge Rules Trump Can’t Block People on Twitter
by PurpleBoxDragon on Thursday May 24, 2018 @09:39AM
(#17143829)
So if Trump isn't banned from using that website, where is the difference from this case?
Re:Judge Rules Trump Can’t Block People on Twitter
by icebraining on Thursday May 24, 2018 @10:58AM
(#17144608)
I'm confused, what website? The hypothetical one? Who said he wouldn't be?