All that law does is standardize various classes. It's a extremely common measure for facilitating trade, e.g.

https://www.ams.usda.gov/grades-standards/cucumber-grades-an...

https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trade/agr/standard/fresh...

I guess the Facebook post he got his info from didn't mention that.

I'm guessing the Daily Mail.

It's _better_ for the EU to define these things. If the EU hasn't done it centrally, member states would be doing it individually. This way:

1) You get a single definition of cucumber class 2C for every country, rather than a bunch of definitions that make trade more complex 2) It's (num_countries_in_EU) times cheaper to do it once than to do it seperately for every single country.

It has become quite clear to me that anyone who brings up the shape of bananas or cucumbers in the EU is either just spreading FUD because they've decided they're against the EU for other reasons, or believes anything the papers tell them without applying critical thinking to the matter.

> Recently they passed regulation that limits the power consumption over regular vacuum cleaners.

So why do you think laws like this are irrelevant?

Other people already pointed out the mistakes in your argument as this is necessary to build a common market across dozens of countries and hundreds of millions of people. Please read up on what the EU is trying to do, you really don't seem to have a grasp on it.

Classifying produce only helps the consumer. You'd be a little annoyed if every week you went to the supermarket and they had a varying quality/size of produce but the price remained the same.

While I agree with quality standards, if the produce is priced by the kilo, it might certainly be more beneficial to have different sizes of it.