News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Court confirms that IP addresses are personal data only i... by jlgaddis on Saturday May 19, 2018 @04:21PM (#17109565)
The main takeaway (IMO) from this article is right here:

> However, businesses should note that if they have sufficient information to link an IP address to a particular individual (e.g., through login details, cookies, or any other information or technology) then that IP address is personal data, and is subject to the full protections of EU data protection law.

Re:Court confirms that IP addresses are personal data only i... by clarry on Saturday May 19, 2018 @05:15PM (#17109768)
Can we interpret have as can obtain?

Do a geolookup, you have my approximate location.

Do a Google search for my IP address and you'll have my name.

Re:Court confirms that IP addresses are personal data only i... by kekumu on Saturday May 19, 2018 @05:41PM (#17109876)
I would. Better to be overly cautious if you're serious about protecting user data and privacy.

IPs specifically are quite likely to reveal some identifying info, and it's obvious how trivial it is to find that info. Even the company itself isn't looking that info up, losing that info could expose their users.

Re:Court confirms that IP addresses are personal data only i... by jlgaddis on Saturday May 19, 2018 @06:03PM (#17109964)
> Can we interpret have as can obtain?

From my reading, you can interpret it that way if "the website operator has a 'legal means' of obtaining access to the information".

Refer to the "What makes a dynamic IP address personal data?" section of TFA.

(N.B.: I am not a lawyer. Ask your doctor if taking legal advice from strangers on the Internet is right for you.)

Re:Court confirms that IP addresses are personal data only i... by threeseed on Saturday May 19, 2018 @06:00PM (#17109954)
> Do a Google search for my IP address and you'll have my name.

How does that happen exactly ?

Re:Court confirms that IP addresses are personal data only i... by dylz on Saturday May 19, 2018 @06:34PM (#17110084)
Business class internet at home often will reassign it to your full name and address, for example.
Re:Court confirms that IP addresses are personal data only i... by clarry on Saturday May 19, 2018 @07:13PM (#17110240)
You'll find my whois records as well as my personal domain names.

Name is required on the whois record, but even if it could be anonymized, it'd still have the registrar's name. I am my registrar.

Re:Court confirms that IP addresses are personal data only i... by tjoff on Saturday May 19, 2018 @06:06PM (#17109978)
> Do a geolookup, you have my approximate location.

Nowhere near "personally identifiable" nor necessarily correct in any way.

> Do a Google search for my IP address and you'll have my name.

That would be highly unusual.

Re:Court confirms that IP addresses are personal data only i... by jlgaddis on Saturday May 19, 2018 @06:14PM (#17110006)
It's certainly possible. There are plenty of people who have been assigned (usually small) subnets (e.g., a /28 or /29) and have their name, address, phone number, etc., publicly available via WHOIS. (For "residential customers", it was acceptable to not publish their personal details, however.)

I'm not sure about the other RIRs but ARIN, at least, has (had?) a requirement that any assignment of a /29 or larger must be reported (see "SWIP" [0]).

In other cases, a PTR RR for a single IP address could be enough to personally identify an individual.

[0]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_Whois_Project

Re:Court confirms that IP addresses are personal data only i... by tjoff on Sunday May 20, 2018 @04:46AM (#17111866)
I think we have different meaning of plenty.

Commercial entities doesn't really map to one person. I thought WHOIS would have to be amended to be compatible with GDPR anyway.

I mean, you could create a website dedicated to mapping your current IP to yourself if you really wanted to, but that is hardly relevant.