News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mugshots.com’s alleged co-owners arrested on extortion ch... by olliej on Friday May 18, 2018 @04:58PM (#17104900)
here’s what I don’t get: why are mug shots public at any point prior to conviction?

Should these people go to jail? Yes, it’s extortion plain and simple. But they should never have had these images for anyone who was not found guilty - or in this case even charged.

Re:Mugshots.com’s alleged co-owners arrested on extortion ch... by anigbrowl on Friday May 18, 2018 @05:54PM (#17105266)
The claim for publication is that the public has a right to know about potential criminal activity and so on. Of course, the reality is that publication of the mugshot is accepted by many as proof of criminal liability notwithstanding disclaimers to the contrary.

It's less clear why police departments publish them, but I think it has a lot to do with sheriffs and prosecutors being elected offices in the US. I've never agreed with this process since the potential for abuse is so obvious, and also since it makes it that much more difficult, time-consuming, and expensive to assemble a neutral jury when a case does go to trial.

Re:Mugshots.com’s alleged co-owners arrested on extortion ch... by jayceekay on Saturday May 19, 2018 @10:44PM (#17110895)
the government posts them for transparency, so they're not accused of just disappearing people