News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Acephalic Agile: Worse than Waterfall? by Nomentatus on Thursday May 17, 2018 @05:57PM (#17096363)
Principle 4 of twelve: "Business people and developers must work together daily throughout the project."

https://www.agilealliance.org/agile101/12-principles-behind-...

It would be odd if "business people" just meant the developers' upper management within their firm; supervising costs and parking spaces; but not those without a stake in using the software that results, say.

Re:Acephalic Agile: Worse than Waterfall? by abritinthebay on Thursday May 17, 2018 @10:31PM (#17098214)
Business people doesn’t mean customers however. Which was my point.

In fact the only time the customer is mentioned is in principle one: “Our highest priority is to satisfy the customer through early and continuous delivery of valuable software.”

Business people absolutely should be involved - product owners & stakeholders (or a proxy for them).

That’s fundamental but again: business people != customers.

You seem to think stakeholders/product owners are devs direct managers too. That’s rarely the case, if ever, on any functioning agile team I’ve seen. They’re orthogonal to each other.

Re:Acephalic Agile: Worse than Waterfall? by Nomentatus on Friday May 18, 2018 @12:18AM (#17098661)
I think I answered this possible objection, but you've ignored that. Also, I made a distinction between stakeholders and devs direct managers, rather than conflating them.

I don't believe I can be of further assistance to you.

Re:Acephalic Agile: Worse than Waterfall? by abritinthebay on Friday May 18, 2018 @11:48PM (#17106555)
Your answer fell short and is contradicted by the agile principles. Your distinction was practically meaningless given your later usage.

You were never any “assistance”. You had nothing of substance to add.