News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Acephalic Agile: Worse than Waterfall? by gaius on Thursday May 17, 2018 @05:08PM (#17095839)
Right, Agile is for outsourced/offshore teams cranking out intranets or shopping carts or adding another minor feature to an existing codebase written by someone else. Like maintenance on a legacy app.

The kind of work that good engineers thrive on - a hard problem starting with en empty Emacs buffer - is something that the methodology merchants have never experienced themselves. The only product they ever shipped is the methodology itself!

I say this as a one-time “certified scrum master”.

Re:Acephalic Agile: Worse than Waterfall? by prepend on Thursday May 17, 2018 @05:15PM (#17095935)
This is a pretty tough statement to defend. Take a look at the myriad of open source projects, or just limit it to Apache’s http://apache.org/index.html#projects-list and you’ll see a bunch of “empty emacs buffer” projects with a long audit trail of agile development. Not necessarily scrum.
Re:Acephalic Agile: Worse than Waterfall? by gaius on Thursday May 17, 2018 @05:22PM (#17096021)
My only personal experience of agile is scrum, so I will concede your point :-)