Re:A Linguist Explains Why 'Laurel' Sounds Like 'Yanny'
by Grue3 on Thursday May 17, 2018 @02:25AM
(#17089220)
The audio was derived entirely from a recording of a man saying "laurel" (can be heard here: [1]). There's no recording of him saying "yanny" because it isn't a word. The high frequencies of "laurel" do in fact sound like "yanny".
Re:A Linguist Explains Why 'Laurel' Sounds Like 'Yanny'
by rcthompson on Thursday May 17, 2018 @02:28AM
(#17089242)
Well, if someone doctored a recording of "laurel" to make it sound like "yanny" and then mixed it back into the original recording of laurel (or did something mathematically equivalent), then maybe both the article and my comment are correct.
Re:A Linguist Explains Why 'Laurel' Sounds Like 'Yanny'
by tristanj on Thursday May 17, 2018 @04:29AM
(#17089709)
Mixing two audio files is contrary to what the people who posted this to instagram & twitter stated they did.
Re:A Linguist Explains Why 'Laurel' Sounds Like 'Yanny'
by tristanj on Thursday May 17, 2018 @04:19AM
(#17089676)
> The reason you can hear both is because someone took the high frequencies of "yanny" and combined them with the low frequencies of "laurel".
No, I very much doubt this is a doctored recording. Wired did an interview with the person(s) who first discovered it [0]. They played the pronunciation of "laurel" from vocabulary.com [1] on their computer and re-recorded the audio to their phone, then posted it to instagram. The audio sounds distorted because it was played through laptop speakers and recorded again with a microphone.
The "laurel/yanny" effect is also reproducible with the audio from the original source at [1]. You don't need to doctor the audio to hear it.
[0] https://www.wired.com/story/yanny-and-laurel-true-history/
[1]: http://www.123opticalillusions.com/pages/albert-einstein-mar...