"We've read your code"

Re:"We've read your code" by jrockway on Monday September 20, 2010 @08:14AM (#1708500)

It's not. When sharing code, there is no obligation to do anything. More people will contribute and share if you have well-documented clean code, but if you just want to throw something up there, that's good too.

Too many people don't contribute at all because the Internet is full of people looking gift horses in the mouth and they figure it's safer to not share at all. And that's not good for anyone.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"We've read your code" by hussong on Monday September 20, 2010 @11:42AM (#1709217)

That's so true. Over a year ago, I put a crappy PHP snippet on snipplr and forgot about it. Last week, I came back and found that eight people had saved it and three had left a comment. It's literally just one line of PHP, but it solved a problem for a couple people.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"We've read your code" by gaius on Tuesday September 21, 2010 @07:45AM (#1712215)

Well, yes, OK, there's no law that says you have to. But it is polite.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"We've read your code" by IgorPartola on Monday September 20, 2010 @09:58AM (#1708800)

So sharing a crappy piece of code with poor documentation is better than holding out until you can release a tested product? I don't buy it. Case in point: the many terrible suggestions in the PHP documentation comments.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"We've read your code" by salvadors on Monday September 20, 2010 @10:19AM (#1708883)

Yes. It gives the next poor schmuck something to work from.

That's assuming a world, of course, where at least some people actually use free software as something to hack on, rather than as a product to bitch about.

[ Parent | on HN ]