News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Language of the Roman Empire by WalterBright on Wednesday May 16, 2018 @11:56AM (#17083399)
Foundational as well is the printing press. Rome didn't have one, and perhaps went as far as it could without it.

While the printing press is probably required for industrialization, it is not sufficient. Your point about slavery holding it back is a good one.

Re:The Language of the Roman Empire by Balgair on Wednesday May 16, 2018 @12:41PM (#17083860)
Part of what made the printing press work was the metallurgy required. You needed quality iron and steel for the screws and the typefaces, brass and bronze would not endure the stresses. Those metallurgic advancements largely came out of war and the need for metals that could handle black-powder explosions.
Re:The Language of the Roman Empire by WalterBright on Wednesday May 16, 2018 @02:29PM (#17085104)
Even Gutenberg's primitive press, which was built out of a wooden wine press, was revolutionary. It used cast lead type. The Romans had lead technology.
Re:The Language of the Roman Empire by Balgair on Wednesday May 16, 2018 @02:37PM (#17085172)
Thanks for the clarification!
Re:The Language of the Roman Empire by WalterBright on Wednesday May 16, 2018 @12:11PM (#17083523)
Further support for this notion comes from the fact that in the southern US slave states, it was illegal to teach the slaves to read.

It would be pretty hard to industrialize when the workforce is forcibly kept ignorant.