News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What we've learned from building Ghost after 5 years and $3M by johnonolan on Wednesday May 16, 2018 @11:05AM (#17082970)
We do managed hosting, so the comparison is to "Managed WP Hosting" - which is exactly what the page says. Here's an example of a managed WP host: https://wpengine.com/plans/

Here is an independent speed test which finds Ghost (more specifically: Node) to be up to 1900% faster than WP - https://blog.appdynamics.com/engineering/example-node-js-fas...

We don't make baseless claims and we're not in the business of lying to anyone.

Re:What we've learned from building Ghost after 5 years and $3M by detaro on Wednesday May 16, 2018 @11:26AM (#17083143)
Why are they a fair comparison point, and not e.g. wordpress.com?
Re:What we've learned from building Ghost after 5 years and $3M by johnonolan on Wednesday May 16, 2018 @12:50PM (#17083954)
Shared hosting - $1.99, here's your server, good luck

Managed hosting - $29, you get your own server, app, automation, backups, and 24/7 support to make sure everything is working great

Centralised, multi-tenant application - $0-$9, you get no server. You get access to our app for your use. You cannot modify it or run any third party code.

We do managed hosting - and managed WP hosts... also do managed hosting. That's why it's a reasonable comparison point.

WordPress.com is not managed hosting. It's a heavily modified centralised multi-tenant application which loosely resembles WordPress. It does not run the open source codebase at all.

Re:What we've learned from building Ghost after 5 years and $3M by georgestephanis on Wednesday May 16, 2018 @05:29PM (#17086661)
Hi. I've worked for WordPress.com for the past five years. It does run the open source WordPress codebase, and we sync changes from the open source project to WordPress.com regularly.

:vanishes in a puff of php:

Re:What we've learned from building Ghost after 5 years and $3M by johnonolan on Wednesday May 16, 2018 @09:32PM (#17087965)
Yes George. WordPress.com is a centralised, multi-tenant application which also syncs code from the open source project. Very good.

It's still not equivalent to running the same code, or being in any way a comparable to a managed host. Which is the point that you skipped right over, as is your custom :)

Re:What we've learned from building Ghost after 5 years and $3M by bwoj on Wednesday May 16, 2018 @05:25PM (#17086639)
WPEngine is specifically in the business of selling fast WordPress hosting. It actually makes for a more honest comparison. Comparing to Wordpress.com should give you better numbers.