You keep stretching your argument so far, I can only thank you for linking to sources, since reading them disproves your claim.

In the opt link, it's a "news" item, not a "Fact-check" with a ruling. You pick out mild vague statements as "discrediting", while ignoring all the major points and claims in the Snopes articles.

The second link is a fact-check, which we can all agree (right") is an accurate fact-check

FB banned a self-identified obvious satire article being reposted out of context as non-satire. Can you find an example of FB banning a non-fake article based on Snopes' ruling?

Again, what's the problem here?