News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Employers are monitoring computers, toilet breaks, even e... by pmoriarty on Monday May 14, 2018 @10:15PM (#17071119)
And yet another alternative to consider: employee-owned and run corporations.
Re:Employers are monitoring computers, toilet breaks, even e... by danieltillett on Tuesday May 15, 2018 @04:17AM (#17072431)
Pity they can't compete with capitalist owned and run corporations. I would love for them to work, but they all seem to end up failing [0].

0. Yes I know there are the odd exceptions, but these are so rare they almost prove the point.

Re:Employers are monitoring computers, toilet breaks, even e... by meheleventyone on Tuesday May 15, 2018 @04:47AM (#17072548)
Isn't the question whether or not they fail at a higher rate than more traditional corporations? For example many fewer employee owned companies started is going to make the successful look exceptional even if they are more likely to succeed.
Re:Employers are monitoring computers, toilet breaks, even e... by danieltillett on Thursday May 17, 2018 @07:38AM (#17090439)
If fewer employee owned companies are started it just means the failure is upfront.
Re:Employers are monitoring computers, toilet breaks, even e... by meheleventyone on Friday May 18, 2018 @03:24PM (#17104232)
If you want to know relatively which does better you need to compare success in each population.

There are a lot of confounding factors in why different types of companies are founded. Saying that less employee owned companies are started is evidence of failure is at best a very shaky understanding of how to look at the business landscape.