But in the contract, you already agreed to let them charge you every month. I don't know the wording, but it probably doesn't say "as long as this card is active". This wasn't a case, if I read correctly, of automatically renewing when he hadn't agreed to that, but of him promising to pay until he cancelled his account, and then admittedly attempting to defraud zipcar by neither paying nor canceling.
There should be a federal law preventing this behavior. It's dishonest and a very bad practice.
To be clear, do you mean the practice of agreeing to charges you have no intention of paying? ;)
I agree, though, that we desperately need contract reform. Maybe contracts which are not individually executed by at least one person on each side should be advisory only, or something. What with the uncertainty surrounding TOS, EULAs, licenses, and 20 pages of fine print, they nearly are anyway, in practice.
oh and you can write a contract to do a lot of things--doesn't mean they all should be legal.
If your service is good, people will renew automatically. Given the proliferation of online services, it is absolutely impractical for people to keep track of many dozens of expiration dates.
There should be a federal law preventing this behavior. It's dishonest and a very bad practice. Zipcar should be held liable for any damage to this lad's credit. GRRR