Re:Stock-trading app Robinhood was rejected by 75 investors
by sokoloff on Monday May 14, 2018 @06:22AM
(#17064242)
> What if every company checked that box and couldn't provide lasting value beyond that?
How long do you think that would be a sustainable situation? A high mid to late-private stage valuation is only supported by the promise of subsequent valuations.
If every company stopped achieving those subsequent valuations, it would feed back into the private valuations.
Re:Stock-trading app Robinhood was rejected by 75 investors
by JumpCrisscross on Monday May 14, 2018 @01:28AM
(#17062929)
> What if every company checked that box and couldn't provide lasting value beyond that?
That would mean an overheated late-stage market. (Which recent IPO data haven’t yet made obvious is a thing.)
Re:Stock-trading app Robinhood was rejected by 75 investors
by argonaut on Monday May 14, 2018 @02:40AM
(#17063248)
Ignoring any one specific company for a moment, an investor consistently able to invest early and time their exits near the peak of each company's valuation would be a roaring success.
Re:Stock-trading app Robinhood was rejected by 75 investors
by ryguytilidie on Monday May 14, 2018 @01:36PM
(#17067501)
That's my point. We're saying that Robinhood is a success as a company because an early investor would have had a nice exit? Thats our "success" barometer?
I'm going to call BS on that one.
What if every company checked that box and couldn't provide lasting value beyond that? Do we still consider this a success because we're posting on a forum run by a VC?