Re:Why We Should Listen to Flat Earth Believers (Even Though...
by some_account on Sunday May 13, 2018 @01:10PM
(#17059884)
Probability is also based on what you know. Nobody believed NSA was collating information about Americans online the way they did, so using probability you don't reach the correct answer. The CIA is smuggling drugs and has committed lots of serious crimes across the world. Again, what is the probability of this?
Re:Why We Should Listen to Flat Earth Believers (Even Though...
by naasking on Sunday May 13, 2018 @03:32PM
(#17060549)
Quite a few people believed the NSA were collecting everything, but I agree that quantifying what you don't know is challenging. Even so, you often don't need to precisely quantify each outcome so long as you can calculate a relative difference between the various outcomes you are aware of. Most questions in daily lifehave order of magnitude differences between them.
I don't think it's productive to label anyone stupid, but a complete inability to properly weigh probability is damning to claims of intelligence. For instance, the scope of the conspiracy needed to fake the moon landings is completely implausible. And when you consider the incentive the USSR would have had in exposing it as a hoax, it goes from implausible to literally impossible. Similar arguments apply to the safety of vaccines, flat Earth, and other absurd hoaxes.
This is considerably different to the repetition of "common knowledge" which ultimately turns out to be some kind of urban legend.