Re:Seaweed in Cow Feed Reduces Methane Emissions Almost Enti...
by SiVal on Friday May 11, 2018 @03:54AM
(#17045643)
I'm confused. (I literally mean it, I'm not advocating anything). If the urchins were dying off, I can understand why that would devastate the urchin divers, but why would a boom in urchins put them out of business? Why aren't the urchin divers doing the vacuuming and making more money than ever from a bumper crop of urchins?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Seaweed in Cow Feed Reduces Methane Emissions Almost Enti...
by rch on Friday May 11, 2018 @10:20AM
(#17047458)
There two species involved. From the linked article:
"Compared to red urchins ... [purple urchins are] smaller, less meaty and not worth fishing for. And they're voracious eaters of kelp."
https://www.kqed.org/science/1357320/scientists-and-fisherme...
Re:Seaweed in Cow Feed Reduces Methane Emissions Almost Enti...
by Wile_E_Quixote on Friday May 11, 2018 @11:12AM
(#17047848)
After vacuuming up a bunch of purple urchins, would it be possible to alter their DNA to be more like that of red urchins? Then release those genetically modified urchins back into the ocean to pass their “red-shifted” traits into the greater purple urchin population.
I realize there are plenty of ethical issues surrounding an attempt at genetically modifying an entire species. Perhaps doing so would be irresponsible? It’s not my area of expertise.