The Logical Disaster of Null

Re:The Logical Disaster of Null by qu4z-2 on Thursday May 10, 2018 @07:20PM (#17043732)

Do you know how they're solving the problem of the language expecting a `default(T)` to exist for every type?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Logical Disaster of Null by masklinn on Wednesday May 16, 2018 @08:43AM (#17081909)

You can get a pretty complete overview at https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/dotnet/2017/11/15/nullable-...

But essentially they're not solving it: you will get a warning on explicit default-ing of a non-nullable reference, you will get a warning on implicitly initialising/defaulting class fields, but you will not get warnings when doing so for structs or arrays.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Logical Disaster of Null by qu4z-2 on Sunday May 27, 2018 @07:17PM (#17169679)

Thanks. That looks quite interesting.

[ Parent | on HN ]