> not because they're crooked per se
If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, is it not a duck?
The end result in terms of narrow corporate interest winning out over overwhelming public sentiment is indistinguishable from bribery.
If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, is it not a duck?
The end result in terms of narrow corporate interest winning out over overwhelming public sentiment is indistinguishable from bribery.
So even with the best of intentions, the system conspires against legislators getting an informed yet neutral viewpoint on how policy will affect the myriad systems that make up our society. As if that weren't enough the anti-intellectual streak in America tends punishes anyone who tries to bring in more nuance and public research to difficult questions.