Re:Microsoft Turned Consumers Against the Skype Brand
by DrPhish on Thursday May 10, 2018 @11:57AM
(#17040049)
I agree completely with your assessment. I used to gripe about SfB, but Teams is hilariously bad. Off the top of my head:
However I do like the ability to add random onenotes etc to channels, and to be fair it has been getting better, albeit slowly
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Microsoft Turned Consumers Against the Skype Brand
by yakk0 on Thursday May 10, 2018 @12:15PM
(#17040230)
Teams does something much better than SfB. It keeps IMs in sync between clients and devices. If I reply to an IM on my phone in SfB it stays on my phone. There's no way to get that conversation history onto my desktop client. Teams acts like you would expect and all clients get all the history.
Re:Microsoft Turned Consumers Against the Skype Brand
by StringyBob on Friday May 11, 2018 @02:15AM
(#17045285)
Yes SfB's biggest problem is that it has skype in the name so people try to use it as an instant messenger.
It's ok for audio/video, but an abomination for instant messages - almost spitefully bad for text based communication due to the way it randomly redirects messages within a conversation to e.g. Outlook.
Re:Microsoft Turned Consumers Against the Skype Brand
by coredog64 on Thursday May 10, 2018 @12:15PM
(#17040227)
Add to that "crappy search" and "scrolling back through history results in long delays during which the entire display is blanked".
Re:Microsoft Turned Consumers Against the Skype Brand
by Klathmon on Thursday May 10, 2018 @01:26PM
(#17041011)
- Has their own poorly written markdown-WYSIWYG hibrid thing that often puts what i'm writing into some state where I need to clear out the whole message and start over.
- Butchers 2-factor auth on mobile and often puts you into a neverending authentication loop (sending tens of text messages if your second factor is setup like that)
- notifications that never clear unless you click on the channel, scroll to the "unread" message, and wait for a few seconds.