News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Logical Disaster of Null by flipgimble on Thursday May 10, 2018 @07:10AM (#17037851)
I don’t think it’s conflating anything but trying to explain to you the difference between the two concepts. It’s saying that Null for all references types by default is a bad idea, and representing “missing” in a tagged union (sum type, whatever) leads to better code. Your worry about inconsistent type use for the same concept doesn’t really apply when combined with syntactic sugar for optionals.

There are no comments on this comment yet.