Re:The Logical Disaster of Null
by flipgimble on Thursday May 10, 2018 @07:10AM
(#17037851)
I don’t think it’s conflating anything but trying to explain to you the difference between the two concepts. It’s saying that Null for all references types by default is a bad idea, and representing “missing” in a tagged union (sum type, whatever) leads to better code. Your worry about inconsistent type use for the same concept doesn’t really apply when combined with syntactic sugar for optionals.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.