News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Everything old is new again: Microservices by tannhaeuser on Wednesday May 09, 2018 @07:21AM (#17028967)
Sorry for nitpicking, but I think the central value proposition of microservices/SOA is that you communicate with you backend via well-defined network protocols rather than eg. procedure calls so that the client and server technology stack doesn't matter.

Containers have nothing to do with it.

Re:Everything old is new again: Microservices by oreganoz on Wednesday May 09, 2018 @08:40AM (#17029321)
I'm just mentioning that containers may make implementing & deploying microservices easier and thus a more popular solution.
Re:Everything old is new again: Microservices by amirouche on Wednesday May 09, 2018 @10:27AM (#17030067)
How a network protocol is more specified that a procedure call?
Re:Everything old is new again: Microservices by tannhaeuser on Wednesday May 09, 2018 @11:11AM (#17030414)
It's not. The benefit is that

- you can keep a service running long after the project that created it has disbanded and/or the runtime and build environment is deprecated on a given O/S

- you don't necessarily need to deep-dive into the business logic of legacy services

- you can replace a service implementation with another one running on another stack without having to adapt service clients

- you can change auth mechanism outside of the service implementations

- you can scale out (CPU-bound) services onto multiple hosts

Mind you, these benefits are not achieved by using microservices/SOA in itself; the contribution of microservices/SOA, however, is that these design goals aren't impossible to achieve because of architected reasons.