Even in the followup/correction post, they state both:
"In the March 28th email, Officer Earhardt states:
“In reference to your inquiry concerning the March For Our Lives Demonstration, here in the District of Columbia on March 24, 2018. MPD received a permit application several months prior to the actual event, and there was several months of planning for this large event.”"
and then also says:
"we have no reason to believe Officer Scott Earhardt." [regarding his correction]
So they are taking two contradicting quotes from one person, and saying one of them is true and the other is false.
Even in the followup/correction post, they state both:
"In the March 28th email, Officer Earhardt states:
“In reference to your inquiry concerning the March For Our Lives Demonstration, here in the District of Columbia on March 24, 2018. MPD received a permit application several months prior to the actual event, and there was several months of planning for this large event.”"
and then also says: "we have no reason to believe Officer Scott Earhardt." [regarding his correction]
So they are taking two contradicting quotes from one person, and saying one of them is true and the other is false.
What are you trying to argue here?