News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:David Marcus Leaves Messenger to Focus on Blockchain With... by kd5bjo on Tuesday May 08, 2018 @05:34PM (#17025387)
Using a CA instead of proof-of-work, I could see the underlying concept being useful in chain-of-custody type applications or limiting the attack surface of a compromised server.
Re:David Marcus Leaves Messenger to Focus on Blockchain With... by throwawayjava on Tuesday May 08, 2018 @06:06PM (#17025679)
Right. When "Enterprise" says "blockchain", what they mean is some combination of cryptography, an immutable database, and data/control/access/ownership flow logging. Sometimes also a financial product.

I think this word is now like "hacker" or "AI". It's not completely meaningless -- it does have a kinda-sorta fuzzy meaning. But that meaning is different from what techincal experts mean when using the term and is very much audience dependent.

Re:David Marcus Leaves Messenger to Focus on Blockchain With... by MichaelGG on Tuesday May 08, 2018 @10:11PM (#17026970)
That's just misusing the word blockchain. Like saying "cloud server" for "hosting" when there is nothing cloud about it.

Using digital signatures in a chain is not a novel idea. Without PoW you do not need the block part, just records.